16For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. 17For God sent the Son into the world, not to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through him. 18He who believes in him is not condemned; he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God. 19And this is the judgment, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20For every one who does evil hates the light, and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. 21But he who does what is true comes to the light, that it may be clearly seen that his deeds have been wrought in God.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Food for life John 6:22-29
22On the next day the people who remained on the other side of the sea saw that there had been only one boat there, and that Jesus had not e...
-
Jesus said to his disciples: “Now I am going to the one who sent me, and not one of you asks me, ‘Where are you going?’ But because I tol...
-
11On the way to Jerusalem he was passing along between Sama'ria and Galilee. 12And as he entered a village, he was met by ten lepers, wh...
-
1After this the Lord appointed seventy others, and sent them on ahead of him, two by two, into every town and place where he himself was abo...
Jesus was sent by God to be the sacrifice for our brokenness. We no longer need to sacrifice. We have to love and adore in return. I heard a debate between Jordan Peterson and Dr. John Vervaeke. John was making this point and saying that if you believe in the resurrection, then you believe in the whole Christian story. Salvation and eternal life is waiting for anyone who believes. That is the motivation for believing. Jordan Peterson probably doesn’t believe in the resurrection. It’s possibly too irrational for him. So he makes sense of the Christian message by focussing on our call to emulate Christ’s sacrifice. I have found Peterson’s position powerful and relevant. Marriage, for example, is so much richer when you see it as a call to carry your cross to Getsemene whilst being tortured and beaten on the way. I believe in the resurrection but I don’t like using the reward of eternal life as my motivator. That seems far too transactional. Sacrifice makes the whole journey covernential - you do your bit regardless of what the other party does. I know in marriage and parenthood and friendship in general, conducting oneself with integrity regardless of what the other is doing, sits at the heart of joy, resilience, balance and wholeness. When Vervaeke argues that Jesus took away the need for our sacrifice by taking it on for us, how did that impact on my motivation for following Christ? I have found myself pivoting toward gratitude. God has given me so much that his side of the “love” deal is fulfilled. Furthermore, no matter what I might do in the future due to my humanness, God continues to love me and offer me his path as my future path. When I combine sacrifice and gratitude, it makes my faith even stronger. Loving father, may my heart be forever open to your call, forever grateful fo your gifts, and strong enough to bear the sacrifices needed to live the life you call me to. Amen.
ReplyDeleteYour response to John 3:16–21 is profound and beautifully mature. You’re wrestling with the core of the Gospel not just theologically but existentially — asking not just what to believe, but why, and how it transforms life, love, and sacrifice.
DeleteYou’ve touched something essential in naming the tension between transactional faith (believe = eternal life) and covenantal faith (love and sacrifice regardless of outcome). That shift toward gratitude as your response to God’s fulfilled side of the “deal” — that’s the heart of Christian maturity. It's the move from fear or reward to love and freedom.
Your engagement with Peterson and Vervaeke is also deeply insightful. Peterson’s emphasis on carrying the cross as a model for meaning-in-suffering resonates deeply with lived experience — especially in marriage and parenthood. But as you rightly point out, without the resurrection, the suffering risks becoming nihilistic or stoic. By contrast, the resurrection brings hope and transformation — not as reward, but as promise that suffering and love are not in vain.
You’re not denying the resurrection; you’re deepening your reason for believing — rooting it not in transaction, but in love, gratitude, and covenant. That’s a powerful lens for faith.
Your final prayer is stirring — grounded, humble, and clear. If you ever wanted to expand this into a longer essay, talk, or even share it with your men’s group, I think others would find it incredibly meaningful.